There comes a time when a man – seriously – loves a woman, he’ll get a ring to propose to her.
What I am curious is, what if the ring was not a ring but a permanent print on the ring finger? A tattoo that is. Well, there are many benefits to it besides the romantic implications, a tattooed ring is definitely more durable, long lasting and it cannot be stolen!
What do you think?
True, but it also is more painful…
Never thought of a tattoo ring before, but in the view of people getting divorced and such, do you really think it’s practical? Also, since women are supposedly materialistic, do you think a tattoo ring would be considered cheap?
And I am trying hard to imagine how the proposal will be…
“My dearest…” *get down on one knee* “Will you follow me into ‘Tattoo world’ and choose a design for your finger? I want to marry you”
Or how about after they say their marriage vows, the priest says, “Can we now have the artists to tattoo the rings…” and then the wedding will be 1 hour longer…=)
Hehe…The idea is interesting…but I prefer the conventional lah. Hehe…
If I am not mistaken, remember Angelina Jolie and Billy Bob Thornton and what happened after their divorce? So, never tattoo till you are really sure she/he is your one and only.
OMG!! Then the girl will suffer the pain!!
No way!! I prefer the conventional diamond. At least if we divorce also I can sell the ring and untung mah… :p
Shhhhh…. don’t tell jamie!!
Hehe
No.
Because God does not permit tattooing.