As we try to reach forth for a future where our growing generations are not only critical towards ideas but are creative and innovative, we need to address our archaic method of education.
Ultimately, a learned student will need to be investigative and inquisitive, with inquisitiveness as our primary instinct equipped with a sharpened investigative nature.
Oh, but how do we get that?
Let’s review our present teaching style. Everyone will agree that we are taught to memorize and then when tested, just regurgitate them (a term that we use affectionately use often) whenever questions asked have the keywords associated with what we remember. This method works well, yes, and there are definitely “critical thinking” components that are fitted in.. which of course is suppose to be a guide for curiosity to juice in, BUT it is not effective in really getting students the drive to learn how to think.
To tackle the issue, each student need to have the ability to ask questions – and there are such things as stupid questions.. unless stupid questions builds up to asking smarter questions, it remains stupid.
Great! So we know the obvious; to get students thinking, we need to get them asking. How do we evaluate that?
We will run the current formal lecture but evaluation will dramatically change.
If you’re running a formal education, here’s a proposal:
Students will have 3 main folders:
- Questions Folder: to compile all the questions a student asks, whether in class or outside of class while they do their homework / research / extra reading
- Answers Folder: this folder will contain pages from the Question Folder that has matching answers to it
- Notes Folder: Notes taken in class as well as external references and appendices that are collected throughout an academic course
Evaluation is quite simple. The bulk of the score weights are in the HOW students asks questions (therefore most evaluations are done on the Questions Folder – obviously).
The scores are based on the depth of the students’ questions eg. if student asks a definition question like “What is Photosynthesis”, they will get a medium score.. if students asks a more indepth question eg. “How does chlorophyll transform sunlight into food” they will get a higher score. Here’s then a taxonomy of question evaluation:
Ask examples: Lowest score given
Ask definitions: Medium score given
Ask explanations: High score given
Ask exploratory questions: Highest score given.
Total Weight Percentage: 70%
Exploratory Questions are questions that are related to the subject matter being taught but beyond the scope of syllabus.
The Answers Folder will fill in the rest of the 30%.
It is also important to encourage collaborative efforts, so if students wrote answers that they gained through teamwork effort (via simply asking, group study, asking other teachers, asking seniors), they should gain more points (from the 30%).
With that, I end a proposal about a rough guide to Creative Education.

